Showing posts with label 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2013. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2013

NEW FOR 2013 LOW COST RESPIRATORY SUPPLEMENT



NEW FOR 2013:     Introducing…

THE HIMALAYAS SALT PUFFERâ„¢





A REVOLUTIONARY RESPIRATORY SUPPLEMENT DEVICE MADE IN THE USA

100% NATURAL – MINERAL SALT INHALER – FILLED WITH GENUINE HIMALAYAN SALT

TODAY, OUR AIR IS POLLUTED INSIDE & OUT. MORE & MORE PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING FROM ALLERGIES, ASTHMA, COPD & OTHER RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES. DRUGS FOR THESE AILMENTS CAN BE EXPENSIVE AND COME WITH SIDE EFFECTS.




FOR DECADES, THOUSANDS WITH RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS HAVE FOUND LASTING RELIEF FROM VISITING THE SALT MINES IN EUROPE FOR SPELEOTHERAPY, BREATHING IN THE RICH, CLEAN SALT AIR. IT CAN BE VERY EXPENSIVE AND TIME CONSUMING TO VISIT. TWO RESOURCEFUL HUNGARIANS WITH RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS DEVELOPED THE FIRST GENERATION, HAND-HELD, SALT INHALER. BUT IT WAS BULKY, NON-REFILLABLE AND MADE OF BREAKABLE CERAMICS.

FEATURES OF THE NEW HIMALAYAS SALT PUFFERâ„¢ from www.TheSaltLady.com

*PORTABLE & COVENIENT WITH A NEW COMPACT SLEEK DESIGN THAT FITS IN A SHIRT POCKET OR PURSE

*MADE IN THE USA!  EMPLOYING AMERICANS TO HELP OUR ECONOMY

*MADE FROM THE HIGHEST QUALITY MATERIALS & CRAFTSMANSHIP

*EASY TO CLEAN & REFILL

*VERY AFFORDABLE

*BREAKAGE-RESISTANT

*PRE-FILLED WITH GENUINE HIMALAYAN SALT

*CONTAINS 80+ TRACE MINERALS & ELEMENTS THAT MATCH HUMAN BODY CHEMISTRY

*NO KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS OR DRUG INTERACTIONS

REDUCES INFLAMMATION & AIDS IN EXPELLING EXCESS MUCUS

MAY BE USED FOR ALL RESPIRATORY DISORDERS INCLUDING:

ASTHMA * ALLERGIES * BRONCHITIS * COPD * COLDS * CF * HANTAVIRUS * CHRONIC COUGH * SMOKERS COUGH

GET MORE INFORMATION AT www.SaltPuffer.com

Jay, diagnosed with Hanta-Virus, was told to go to Hospice & Die! Himalayan Salt changed his life! Watch  Jay’s Video

THE FDA HAS NOT EVALUATED THESE STATEMENTS. THIS DEVICE IS NOT MEANT TO DIAGNOSE, TREAT, PREVENT OR CURE ANY DISEASE. CHECK WITH YOUR DOCTOR BEFORE USING THIS DEVICE OR CHANGING ANY MEDICAL TREATMENTS.

PATENT PENDING © 2012 SALT PUFFER LLC, A HEALTH & WELLNESS COMPANY


Great news…
It’s here…The latest in the arsenal to treat Asthma, COPD and other respiratory conditions.
The SALT PUFFER is a compact Himalayan Salt-filled Inhaler Respiratory Supplement designed from years of research and feedback from thousands of customers. Click on Salt Puffer to read more about this new way to get relief naturally without side effects or drug interactions. Made in the USA!

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Products - Data Briefs - Number 121 - May 2013 ► Trends in Allergic Conditions Among Children: United States, 1997–2011

Products – Data Briefs – Number 121 – May 2013


NCHS Data Brief


Number 121, May 2013


Trends in Allergic Conditions Among Children: United States, 1997–2011




PDF Version Adobe PDF file (444 KB)
Kristen D. Jackson, M.P.H.; LaJeana D. Howie, M.P.H., C.H.E.S.; Lara J. Akinbami, M.D.



Key findings


Data from the National Health Interview Survey, 1997–2011



  • The prevalence of food and skin allergies increased in children under age 18 years from 1997–2011.

  • The prevalence of skin allergies decreased with age. In contrast, the prevalence of respiratory allergies increased with age.

  • Hispanic children had a lower prevalence of food allergy, skin allergy, and respiratory allergy compared with children of other race or ethnicities. Non-Hispanic black children were more likely to have skin allergies and less likely to have respiratory allergies compared with non-Hispanic white children.

  • Food and respiratory allergy prevalence increased with income level. Children with family income equal to or greater than 200% of the poverty level had the highest prevalence rates.


Allergic conditions are among the most common medical conditions affecting children in the United States (1–5). An allergic condition is a hypersensitivity disorder in which the immune system reacts to substances in the environment that are normally considered harmless (6,7). Food or digestive allergies, skin allergies (such as eczema), and respiratory allergies (such as hay fever) are the most common allergies among children. Allergies can affect a child’s physical and emotional health and can interfere with daily activities, such as sleep, play, and attending school (8,9). A severe allergic reaction with rapid onset, anaphylaxis, can be life threatening. Foods represent the most common cause of anaphylaxis among children and adolescents (10,11). Early detection and appropriate interventions can help to decrease the negative impact of allergies on quality of life (6). This report presents recent trends in the prevalence of allergies and differences by selected sociodemographic characteristics for children under age 18 years.
Keywords: allergy, National Health Interview Survey



The prevalence of food and skin allergies increased in children aged 0–17 years from 1997–2011.


Among children aged 0–17 years, the prevalence of food allergies increased from 3.4% in 1997–1999 to 5.1% in 2009–2011. The prevalence of skin allergies increased from 7.4% in 1997–1999 to 12.5% in 2009–2011. There was no significant trend in respiratory allergies from 1997–1999 to 2009–2011, yet respiratory allergy remained the most common type of allergy among children throughout this period (17.0% in 2009–2011). Skin allergy prevalence was also higher than food allergy prevalence for each period from 1997–2011 (Figure 1).



Figure 1. Percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months: United States, 1997–2011

Figure 1 is a line graph showing the percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months for 1997–2011.


1Significant increasing linear trend for food and skin allergy from 1997–1999 to 2009–2011.
SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, Health Data Interactive, National Health Interview Survey.



Younger children were more likely to have skin allergies, while older children were more likely to have respiratory allergies.


Food allergy prevalence was similar among all age groups. Skin allergy prevalence decreased with the increase of age (14.2% among 0–4 years, 13.1% among 5–9 years, and 10.9% among 10–17 years); while respiratory allergy prevalence increased with the increase of age (10.8% among 0–4 years, 17.4% among 5–9 years, and 20.8% among 10–17 years) (Figure 2).



Figure 2. Percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months, by age group: United States, average annual 2009–2011

Figure 2 is a bar chart showing the percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months by age for combined years 2009–2011.


1Significant trend by age group.
SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, Health Data Interactive, National Health Interview Survey.



Hispanic children had lower rates of all three types of allergies compared with children of other race or ethnicities. Non-Hispanic black children were more likely to have skin allergies and less likely to have respiratory allergies compared with non-Hispanic white children.


Hispanic children had a lower prevalence of food allergy (3.6%), skin allergy (10.1%), and respiratory allergy (13.0%) compared with non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black children. Non-Hispanic black children had a higher percentage of reported skin allergy (17.4%) compared with non-Hispanic white children (12.0%) and a lower percentage of respiratory allergy (15.6%) compared with non-Hispanic white children (19.1%) (Figure 3).



Figure 3. Percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months, by race and ethnicity: United States, average annual 2009–2011

Figure 3 is bar chart showing the percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months by race and ethnicity for combined years 2009–2011.


1Hispanic significantly different than all other race groups.
2The differences between all race groups are statistically significant.
SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, Health Data Interactive, National Health Interview Survey.



The prevalence of food and respiratory allergy, but not skin allergy, increased with higher income levels.


The prevalence of both food allergy and respiratory allergy increased with the increase of income level. Among children with family income less than 100% of the poverty level, 4.4% had a food allergy and 14.9% had a respiratory allergy. Food allergy prevalence among children with family income between 100% and 200% of the poverty level was 5.0%, and respiratory allergy prevalence was 15.8%. Among children with family income above 200% of the poverty level, food allergy prevalence was 5.4%, and respiratory allergy prevalence was 18.3%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of skin allergy by poverty status (Figure 4).



Figure 4. Percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months, by poverty status: United States, average annual 2009–2011

Figure 4 is a bar chart showing the percentage of children aged 0–17 years with a reported allergic condition in the past 12 months by poverty status for combined years 2009–2011.


1Significant trend by poverty status.
SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, Health Data Interactive, National Health Interview Survey.



Summary


Among children under age 18 years in the United States, the prevalence of food and skin allergies increased from 1997–1999 to 2009–2011. The prevalence of respiratory allergy, which is the most prevalent type of allergy among children, did not change during this period. There was no significant difference in food allergy prevalence between age groups. However, skin allergy decreased with the increase of age, and respiratory allergy increased with the increase of age. The prevalence of allergies varies by race and ethnicity, with Hispanic children having the lowest prevalence of food, skin, and respiratory allergies compared with non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black children. Non-Hispanic black children were more likely to have skin allergies and less likely to have respiratory allergies compared with non-Hispanic white children. The prevalence of allergies differed by poverty status. Food allergy and respiratory allergy increased with the increase of income level, but there was no difference in the prevalence of skin allergy by poverty status.



Definitions


Respiratory allergy prevalence: Estimated based on affirmative responses to either of the two National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) question(s): “During the past 12 months, has your child had hay fever?” and “During the past 12 months, has your child had any kind of respiratory allergy?”
Food allergy prevalence: Estimated based on an affirmative response to the NHIS question: “During the past 12 months, has your child had any kind of food or digestive allergy?”
Skin allergy prevalence: Estimated based on an affirmative response to the NHIS question: “During the past 12 months, has your child had eczema or any kind of skin allergy?”
Poverty status: Based on family income, family size, and the number of children in the family; and for families with two or fewer adults, on the age of the adults in the family. The poverty level is based on a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition. Families or individuals with income below their appropriate thresholds are classified as below the poverty level. These thresholds are updated annually by the U.S. Census Bureau to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (12). Estimates by poverty status from NHIS are based on both reported and imputed family income (13).



Data source and methods


Prevalence estimates for allergic conditions were obtained from the Health Data Interactive (HDI) table, “Allergic conditions, ages 0–17: U.S., 1997–2011,” available from the Health Data Interactive website. NHIS data were used to estimate the prevalence of allergic conditions for this HDI table.
NHIS data are collected continuously throughout the year for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics by interviewers from the U.S. Census Bureau. NHIS collects information about the health and the health care of the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population. Interviews are conducted in respondents’ homes, but follow-ups to complete the interviews may be conducted over the telephone. The Sample Child component collects detailed data on health conditions for a randomly selected child in households with at least one child. All of the data in the Sample Child component are obtained from a proxy respondent and not from medical records. A responsible adult, usually a parent, responds to the survey questions as proxy for the sample child. For further information about NHIS and the questionnaire, visit the NHIS website.
NHIS is designed to yield a sample that is representative of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States, and the survey uses weighting to produce national estimates. Data weighting procedures are described in more detail elsewhere (14). Point estimates and estimates of corresponding variances for the HDI estimates were calculated using SUDAAN software (15) to account for the complex sample design of NHIS. The Taylor series linearization method was chosen for variance estimation.
Differences between percentages were evaluated using two-sided significance tests at the 0.05 level. Terms such as “higher” and “lower” indicate statistically significant differences. Terms such as “no difference” indicate that the statistics being compared were not significantly different. Lack of comment regarding the difference between any two statistics does not necessarily suggest that the difference was tested and found to be not significant. All estimates shown in this report have a relative standard error less than or equal to 30%. The significance of trends was tested using weighted least squares regression models of the log of each outcome and Joinpoint software (16) to determine whether an apparent change over time was statistically significant, taking into account the standard error for each data point. Because there were limited data points over the period, linear regression (zero joinpoints) was specified for all models.



About the author


Kristen D. Jackson, LaJeana D. Howie, and Lara J. Akinbami are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, Office of Analysis and Epidemiology.



References




  1. Friedman AH, Morris TL. Allergies and anxiety in children and adolescents: A review of the literature. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 13(3):318–31. 2006.


  2. Gupta RS, Springston EE, Smith B, Kim JS, Pongracic JA, Wang X, Holl J. Food allergy knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of parents with food-allergic children in the United States. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 21(6):927–34. 2010.


  3. Vassallo MF, Banerji A, Rudders SA, Clark S, Mullins RJ, Camargo CA Jr. Season of birth and food allergy in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 104(4):307–13. 2010.


  4. Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Garbe PL, Sondik EJ. Status of childhood asthma in the United States, 1980–2007. Pediatrics 123 Suppl 3:S131–45. 2009.


  5. Mailhol C, Lauwers-Cances V, Rancé F, Paul C, Giordano-Labadie F. Prevalence and risk factors for allergic contact dermatitis to topical treatment in atopic dermatitis: A study in 641 children. Allergy 64(5):801–6. 2009.


  6. Stone KD. Atopic diseases of childhood. Curr Opin Pediatr 14(5):634–46. 2002.


  7. Muraro A, Roberts G, Clark A, Eigenmann PA, Halken S, Lack G. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: Position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 62(8):857–71. 2007.


  8. Baiardini I, Braido F, Brandi S, Canonica GW. Allergic diseases and their impact on quality of life. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 97(4):419–28. 2006.


  9. Marklund B, Ahlstedt S, Nordstrom G. Health-related quality of life among adolescents with allergy-like conditions—with emphasis on food hypersensitivity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:65. 2004.


  10. De Silva IL, Mehr SS, Tey D, Tang ML. Paediatric anaphylaxis: A 5 year retrospective review. Allergy 63(8):1071–6. 2008.


  11. Lee JK, Vadas P. Anaphylaxis: Mechanisms and management. Clin Exp Allergy 41(7):923–38. 2011.


  12. U.S. Census Bureau. PovertyExternal Web Site Icon. 2012.


  13. Schenker N, Raghunathan TE, Chiu PL, et al. Multiple imputation of family income and personal earnings in the National Health Interview Survey: Methods and examples. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2010.


  14. Botman SL, Moore TF, Moriarity CL, Parsons VL. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(130). 2000.


  15. SUDAAN, release 9.1 [computer software]. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International. 2004.


  16. Joinpoint Regression Program, version 3.4 [computer software]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. 2010.




Suggested citation


Jackson KD, Howie LD, Akinbami LJ. Trends in allergic conditions among children: United States, 1997–2011. NCHS data brief, no 121. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.


Copyright information


All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.


National Center for Health Statistics


Charles J. Rothwell, M.S. Acting Director
Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate Director for Science


Office of Analysis and Epidemology

Irma E. Arispe, Ph.D., Director


Products – Data Briefs – Number 121 – May 2013


Friday, September 20, 2013

Fights Many Types of Cancer Liver Detoxification Reduce Cholesterol Levels Up to 40% Protect Against Strokes & Heart Attacks Prevent Alzheimer’s Disease High Antioxidant Properties Could Slow Down Hair Loss Protects & Moisturizes Your Skin Why is this red palm tree oil so powerful and good for you? One of the magic ingredients of the oil is carotene that’s a powerful antioxidant found in tomatoes and carrots. If you combine the amount of beta carotene in carrots and tomatoes it still doesn’t match the amount of carotene in red palm oil. The other ingredient in the oil is tocotrienol which is an incredibly powerful form of vitamin E. It’s the tocotrienols in the the red palm oil that increase blood flow to your brain and stops damage done by free radicals. This is where the Alzheimer’s prevention and Dementia fighting properties come from. Red Palm Oil For Your Hair An incredibly popular use of African Americans is using red palm oil for their hair. Hair care with the oil is touted as one of the healthiest things you can do to treat your hair by moisturizing it and making your hair stronger, thicker and has even been said to prevent hair loss. You can even read about people discussing this palm tree oil in hair loss forums like WorldHairLoss.org on how it has stopped hair loss and grew hair back much ticker. Why haven’t you heard about this miracle health supplement before that is used all over the world? It seems that doctors and researchers in the United States have been reluctant to look into this oil because of saturated fats that are a big part of the make-up of red palm tree oil. There was one interesting moment during the Miracle Products of 2013 episode of Dr. Oz when they displayed at least 15 different oils like Almond Oil, Walnut Oil, Sesame Oil, Sunflower Oil, Pumpkin Seed Oil and more. After displaying all of those oils the Red Palm Oil was displayed to the right and Dr. Oz said, “If you put all these oils together they don’t have the same antioxidant power of this one bottle of Red Palm Oil.” Red Palm Oil vs Other Oils How much red palm oil are you supposed to take to get it’s benefits? Dr. Oz and Bryce Wylde show two tablespoons with the fairly thick oil and recommend that is daily dose you would want to consume to start benefiting from red palm fruit oil. While you wouldn’t want to eat the oil directly it’s very popular and easy to cook with. Red Palm Oil Recipes, Taste & Cooking There are lots of people that have shared interesting red palm oil recipes. A lot of dishes are African based with things like Plantains in Palm Oil, Dahomeny Fish Stew, Palm Butter Soup and Palm-Oil Chop. Soups and red palm oil in the African culture are very pervasive and a main ingredient that is very popular in most soups. Other creative uses people have done are things like using the oil for shortening in your cooking, red palm salad dressing and replacing all cooking oil with red palm oil. If you add the palm oil to your food you might be concerned as to the type of flavors, smells or changes it could make to your dishes. So what does red palm oil taste like? Most cooks report that the oil is tasteless and doesn’t effect flavors and operates just like other oils you might be used to cooking with like vegetable oil, canola oil and olive oil. Beta-Carotene in Red Palm Oil Research Fruits and vegetables that have red, orange and yellow pigments in them almost always contain high levels of beta-carotene. Red Palm Oil’s beta-carotene levels are higher than almost anything you can eat and then it gets converted into Vitamin A in your body. The U.S. National Library of Medicine states that beta-carotene can help prevent and cure the following, “Beta-carotene is used to decrease asthma symptoms caused by exercise; to prevent certain cancers, heart disease, cataracts, and age related macular degeneration (AMD); and to treat AIDS, alcoholism, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, epilepsy, headache, heartburn, high blood pressure, infertility, Parkinson’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, and skin disorders including psoriasis and vitiligo.” In fact the National Library of Medicine lists many other things that beta-carotene, one of the main ingredients in red palm oil can actually cure or prevent. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) can be treated with healthy doses of beta-carotene. Breast cancer in women can be prevented when consuming recommended amounts of red palm oil and cooking with it. The list really goes on and on and you can probably find your own healthy uses for this miracle palm oil. Losing weight can also be easier when adding red palm oil to your diet when compared to other types of cooking oils like margarine or vegetable oil. The way that the palm oil is metabolized in your body allows it to go straight to the liver and ends up increasing your metabolic rate. While other oils that you cook with take your body a long time to break down and get stored as fat, red palm tree oil will be burned up quickly and get your metabolism revved up. Where to Buy Red Palm Oil With all of these health benefits this magic oil has, it’s probably a good thing to find out where you can get red palm oil and where it comes from. The palm oil is manufactured in Africa and Malaysia and imported into the United States. Health food stores and specialty outlets like Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s carry red palm order in stock throughout every season. It’s best to try and get raw organic and virgin red palm oil for the best health. There is also two different types of the oil available with unrefined red palm oil and refined red palm oil. You want the unrefined palm oil and you’ll know when you’ve found it because it will be a red thick substance. Other locations you can get the product online are shopping sites like Amazon and you can even find raw types of the oil on eBay. If that wasn’t enough, there is another very popular use for red palm oil that concerns animals. It seems that using the oil with tropical birds like parrots, African Greys, Timneh Grey, Scarlet Mcaws and more will help people breed their birds. Parrots start breeding when red palm oil is around because it is typically in season in their natural habitat during breeding season. This brings out the natural instincts of parrots to start breeding and people that raise birds have noticed much higher rates of succ